From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Mussoline

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 22, 1986
487 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2727.

April 22, 1986.

James A. Horland, Miami, for petitioner.

Catlin, Saxon, Tuttle Evans and Robert E. Paige, Miami, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


REVISED OPINION


Holding that petitioner Stewart was entitled to invoke the fifth amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination and to refuse to answer questions concerning her financial status and that of the members of her family, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

We have jurisdiction to review this action by certiorari under Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(A), and reject respondent's assertion that rule 9.130 authorizes an interlocutory appeal from the order holding Stewart in civil contempt for failing to comply with a discovery order. We decline to follow those cases that reach a contrary result by relying on cases decided under the earlier rule 4.2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Morgan, 445 So.2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Langbert v. Langbert, 409 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); In re Estate of Rasmussen, 335 So.2d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

In any type of proceeding, a person is exempt from answering questions which may constitute "a link in a chain of evidence leading to his conviction in a criminal case." Fischer v. E.F. Hutton Co., 463 So.2d 289, 290-91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 266 n. 1, 103 S.Ct. 608, 618 n. 1, 74 L.Ed.2d 430, 445 n. 1 (1982) (Marshall, J., concurring); Carson v. Jackson, 466 So.2d 1188, 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Lewis v. First American Bank of Palm Beach County, 405 So.2d 300, 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Stewart was charged with murdering her husband; Stewart argues that the state theorizes that she was motivated by financial gain. Thus, any answers that she may give to questions relating to financial matters, asked at a deposition taken to determine her ability to support her children, may tend to incriminate her.

Certiorari granted; order of contempt quashed.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Mussoline

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 22, 1986
487 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Stewart v. Mussoline

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE D. STEWART, PETITIONER, v. CHARLES J. MUSSOLINE, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 22, 1986

Citations

487 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Toyota Tsusho America v. Crittenden

Appellate jurisdiction is proper. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(A); see also Sears v. Sears, 617 So.2d 807…

Sears v. Sears

However, in Langbert v. Langbert 409 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the court held civil contempt orders are…