From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Flowers Foods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2016
No. 15-1162 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-1162

09-20-2016

JACKY STEWART and BRANDY ANDERSON, Individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FLOWERS FOODS, INC., and FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF BATESVILLE, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY, AND IMPOSING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

On December 15, 2015, the above named Plaintiffs, Jacky Stewart and Brandy Anderson, filed a motion for conditional class certification, (D.E. 40), which was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edward G. Bryant on December 29, 2015, (D.E. 44). In a report and recommendation entered on August 12, 2016, Judge Bryant recommended that certification be granted for all current and former distributors at Flowers Baking Company of Batesville's Tennessee warehouses but that nationwide certification be denied. (D.E. 81 at PageID 1079.) He further recommended that the parties be directed to file a revised, agreed-upon notice. (Id.) As of this date, no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Upon review of the report and motion papers, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the order of the Court. The Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the parties are ordered to file a revised, agreed-upon notice in accordance with the Court's ruling within fourteen days.

Furthermore, Defendants' pending Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification, (D.E. 76), is DISMISSED as moot.

Finally, in an order of this Court dated August 22, 2016, Plaintiffs were directed to file an amended complaint, (D.E. 84.), but as of this date, one has not been filed. Plaintiffs are hereby DIRECTED to file their amended complaint by September 28, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of September 2016.

s/ J. DANIEL BREEN

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stewart v. Flowers Foods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2016
No. 15-1162 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Stewart v. Flowers Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACKY STEWART and BRANDY ANDERSON, Individually, and on behalf of all…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

No. 15-1162 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Hale v. Tyson

Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. Boutelle, 56 Vt. 570, 48 Am. Rep. 821; 2 R. C. L. § 150, p. 1063; Warfield v.…

Collins v. Schneider

The money was stopped in transitu and represented the proceeds of the decree. Stewart v. Flowers, 44 Miss.…