From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephenson v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 3, 1994
640 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1926.

August 3, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Leroy H. Moe, J.

Kenneth G. Spillias of the Law Office of Kenneth G. Spillias, P.A., and David M. Garten, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

James M. Fishman of James M. Fishman, P.A., Miami, for appellee-Frank Grillo.

James E. Tribble of Blackwell Walker, P.A., Miami, for appellees.


Patrick and Deborah Stephenson (the Stephensons) appeal the trial court's order dismissing their amended third party complaint against Frank Grillo (Grillo) with prejudice. The Stephensons' amended third party complaint consisted of three counts sounding in fraud (Count I), negligent misrepresentation (Count II), and indemnification (Count III). The allegations contained in Counts I and II are sufficient to state a cause of action for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. See C J Sapp Publishing Co. v. Tandy Corp., 585 So.2d 290, 292 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1991) (fraud); Atlantic National Bank of Florida v. Vest, 480 So.2d 1328, 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (negligent misrepresentation). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings on Counts I and II. However, we affirm the trial court's order dismissing Count III because the Stephensons failed to state a cause of action for indemnification. See Atlantic National Bank of Florida v. Vest, 480 So.2d 1328, 1331 n. 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

In Count III of the amended third party complaint, the Stephensons alleged that Grillo's wrongful acts of fraud and misrepresentation in connection with a home they purchased from Grillo's employer, Citicorp, subjected Grillo to liability for indemnification. However, Citicorp was injured by the Stephensons' nonpayment of the mortgage and not by Grillo's alleged breach of duty toward the Stephensons. Accordingly, these allegations do not satisfy the Vest element requiring the plaintiff's injury to be a result of the indemnitor's breach of duty to the indemnitee. Therefore, the trial court properly dismissed Count III.

Accordingly, we reverse Counts I and II and remand for further proceedings. We affirm the trial court's judgment on Count III.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stephenson v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 3, 1994
640 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Stephenson v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK F. STEPHENSON AND DEBORAH K. STEPHENSON, APPELLANTS, v. CITICORP…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 3, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)