From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Nolan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1939
257 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Summary

In Stephens v. Nolan (257 App. Div. 856, motion for leave to appeal denied, 281 N.Y. 889) the owner of the automobile was a party.

Summary of this case from Inman v. Merchants Mut. Cas. Co.

Opinion

May 23, 1939.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.


Plaintiff, a passenger in defendant Nolan's automobile, was injured by reason of the negligence of Nolan. At the instance of the defendant Popham (sued as "John Doe"), an adjuster employed by the defendant Maryland Casualty Company, and acting as agent for both Nolan and the company, plaintiff executed a general release and accepted $125 in full settlement of her claims. Plaintiff alleges Popham fraudulently represented that plaintiff's claim against Nolan was not covered by the policy issued by the Maryland Casualty Company and that she could not recover against Nolan because she was not a passenger for hire. Plaintiff alleges negligence on the part of Nolan, her freedom from contributory negligence, and fraud. These allegations are necessary to enable the jury to determine what would have been a fair settlement and to deduct therefrom the amount paid on the delivery of the release. The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff for $1,500, less $125, and defendants appeal. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Stephens v. Nolan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1939
257 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

In Stephens v. Nolan (257 App. Div. 856, motion for leave to appeal denied, 281 N.Y. 889) the owner of the automobile was a party.

Summary of this case from Inman v. Merchants Mut. Cas. Co.
Case details for

Stephens v. Nolan

Case Details

Full title:EDNA J. STEPHENS, Respondent, v. THOMAS NOLAN, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Inman v. Merchants Mut. Cas. Co.

She has alleged the making, falsity and materiality of appellant Johnson's representation, his knowledge of…