From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Dominos Pizza

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 24, 2016
187 So. 3d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5418.

03-24-2016

Dennis C. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. DOMINOS PIZZA, Technology Insurance Co. & Amtrust North America of Florida, Inc./SA, Appellees.

Craig O. Stewart of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. Rayford H. Taylor of Gilson Athans P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.


Craig O. Stewart of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Rayford H. Taylor of Gilson Athans P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stephens v. Dominos Pizza

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 24, 2016
187 So. 3d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Stephens v. Dominos Pizza

Case Details

Full title:Dennis C. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. DOMINOS PIZZA, Technology Insurance Co…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 24, 2016

Citations

187 So. 3d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Castellanos v. Next Door Co.

Clearly this issue is affecting numerous claimants. Since Castellanos, the First District has certified that…