From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staten v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Mar 2, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-0655-F (W.D. Okla. Mar. 2, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-0655-F.

March 2, 2009


ORDER


This action seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner appears pro se and his pleadings are liberally construed.

Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered his Report and Recommendation in this matter on February 3, 2009, recommending that the petition be denied. (Doc. no. 21.) Petitioner filed a timely objection to the Report, objecting to the magistrate judge's recommended findings and conclusions. (Doc. no. 22.) Accordingly, the court reviews all objected to issues de novo.

After careful study of petitioner's objections, the Report, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, the court finds and concludes that it concurs with the magistrate judge's determinations. The court further finds that no purpose would be served by repeating the magistrate judge's determinations or by presenting any additional analysis here.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bacharach is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED in its entirety. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report.


Summaries of

Staten v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Mar 2, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-0655-F (W.D. Okla. Mar. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Staten v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:JAMES KEVIN STATEN, Petitioner, v. DAVID PARKER (WARDEN), Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 2, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-0655-F (W.D. Okla. Mar. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Saunders v. Comm'r

e, 391 F.3d 147, 162 (2d Cir. 2004) (Actual innocence requires "not legal innocence, but factual innocence"),…