From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Zumpf

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 17, 1999
728 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-02507

Opinion filed March 17, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; W. Douglas Baird, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Robert O. Bauer, Jr., Clearwater, for Appellee.


In this appeal of George O. Zumpf's downward departure sentence, the State contends that a preponderance of the evidence does not support the reason given for mitigation. That reason was Zumpf's cooperation with the State. The only support for this reason was statements by defense counsel. This is insufficient because testimony or evidence must be presented. See State v. Licea, 707 So.2d 1155, 1157 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Accordingly, we reverse Zumpf's sentence. Because the sentence was the result of a plea agreement, upon remand Zumpf must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. If he declines that opportunity, the trial court must impose a guidelines sentence.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., Concur.


Summaries of

State v. Zumpf

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 17, 1999
728 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Zumpf

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. GEORGE O. ZUMPF, SR., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 17, 1999

Citations

728 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. Watson

"[R]epresentations of an attorney alone are insufficient to form a valid basis for departure." State v.…

State v. Sawyer

This is insufficient. See State v. Zumpf, 728 So.2d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). The trial judge then asked…