From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit
Jan 26, 1999
727 So. 2d 678 (La. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-KA-819

January 26, 1999.

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE ROBERT J. PITRE, JR., J.

Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Alison Wallis, Thomas Block, Assistant District Attorneys, Gretna, Louisiana, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Wilbert Williams, Dequincy, Louisiana, Pro Se, Defendant/Appellant.

Panel composed of Judges H. CHARLES GAUDIN, SOL GOTHARD and THOMAS F. DALEY.


Defendant, Wilbert Williams, brings this pro se appeal after his plea of guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:27:95.1, and sentence to two years at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

Initially, we note that defendant's motion for appeal was untimely filed. Defendant was sentenced on April 22, 1998. There is neither an oral motion for appeal nor a motion to reconsider sentence in the record. Defendant filed a "Motion for Notice of Appeal" on May 11, 1998, which was granted by the trial court on May 12, 1998.

Time limitations for criminal appeals are designated by LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 914, which provides in pertinent part:

B. The motion for an appeal must be made no later than:

(1) Five days after the rendition of the judgment or ruling from which the appeal is taken.

(2) Five days from the ruling on a motion to reconsider sentence filed pursuant to Article 881.1, should such a motion be filed.

In State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La. 1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a defendant loses the right to obtain an appeal by simply filing a motion for appeal after failing to make a motion for appeal within the time provided in Article 914. Id. at 338. The Counterman court explained that after the time for appealing has elapsed, the conviction and sentence are no longer subject to review under the ordinary appellate process, unless the defendant obtains the reinstatement of his right to appeal. Id. at 338. The proper procedural vehicle for a defendant to seek the exercise of his right to appeal after the time for appeal has expired is an application for post conviction relief pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P. articles 924-930.7. Id. at 339.

Because there is nothing in the record to show that defendant obtained reinstatement of his appeal rights, we dismiss the appeal and remand the matter to allow the defendant opportunity to seek reinstatement of his right to appeal by post conviction relief. See, State v. Orgeron, 97-1054 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/11/98), 708 So.2d 1242; State v. Ockmand, 95-413 (La.App. 11/28/95), 665 So.2d 588.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MATTER REMANDED.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit
Jan 26, 1999
727 So. 2d 678 (La. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. WILBERT WILLIAMS

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 26, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 678 (La. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. Egana

It is well settled that a defendant who fails to make a timely motion for appeal may not remedy the error by…

State v. Bowen

The proper procedural vehicle for a defendant to seek the exercise of his right to appeal after the time for…