From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Weist

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 26, 1986
79 Or. App. 808 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

10-84-08687; CA A36625

Argued and submitted March 14, 1986.

Reversed and remanded June 11, 1986. Reconsideration denied August 1, 1986. Petition for review allowed August 26, 1986 ( 301 Or. 666). See later issue Oregon Reports.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County, Edwin E. Allen, Judge.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

David J. Phillips, Public Defender, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded.


The state appeals a Lane County Circuit Court order granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence. The issue is the same as that considered by this court in a companion case, State v. Weist, 79 Or. App. 435, 720 P.2d 753 (1986), in which defendant appealed a Linn County Circuit Court order denying an identical motion to suppress. The question is whether a search warrant may issue for the investigation of the offense of illegal registration of a motor vehicle, a Class C traffic infraction. ORS 481.130. We held in defendant's earlier appeal that, although an infraction is not a "crime," it is a criminal offense for purposes of ORS 133.535(1).

The trial court's order in this case was based on the issue of whether a search warrant could issue for investigation of an infraction, and that is the only issue properly before us. We need not consider defendant's other attacks on the validity of the search but note that, in our consideration of defendant's appeal from his Linn County conviction, we held they were without merit.

Although the affidavit in support of the search warrant at issue incorrectly designated the offense as a crime, the misstatement is not fatal to the validity of the warrant. State v. McManus, 267 Or. 238, 251, 517 P.2d 250 (1973); State v. Diaz, 29 Or. App. 523, 525, 564 P.2d 1066 (1977).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Weist

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 26, 1986
79 Or. App. 808 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Weist

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MICHAEL GUY WEIST, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 26, 1986

Citations

79 Or. App. 808 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
720 P.2d 755

Citing Cases

State v. Weist

The chief issue presented by this and a companion case also decided today, State v. Weist, 302 Or. 379, 730…