From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Walker

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 5, 1992
593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1992)

Summary

In Walk, the claimant was assaulted and robbed as she walked across a parking lot where employees were required to park.

Summary of this case from Normandy Ins. Co. v. Bouayad

Opinion

No. 78193.

March 5, 1992.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fourth District — Case No. 90-1919, St. Lucie County.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Bureau Chief, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We originally accepted for review Walker v. State, 580 So.2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), based on conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.

In Walker the Fourth District held that life felonies are not subject to enhancement under the habitual offender statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). In 1986 the First District had reached the opposite conclusion in Watson v. State, 504 So.2d 1267, 1270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied 506 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 1987). However, in 1990, the First District held in Johnson v. State, 568 So.2d 519, 520 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), that life felonies are not subject to the provisions of the habitual offender statute. This holding is consistent with the holding in Walker. Consequently, the cited decisions present no direct and express conflict as required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. See Little v. State, 206 So.2d 9, 10 (Fla. 1968) (holding that in the result of intradistrict conflict, the decision later in time overrules the former as the decisional law in the district).

Accordingly, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this cause and the case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

McDONALD, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State v. Walker

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 5, 1992
593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1992)

In Walk, the claimant was assaulted and robbed as she walked across a parking lot where employees were required to park.

Summary of this case from Normandy Ins. Co. v. Bouayad

In Walker, this Court reiterated that the MCC aspect of "arising out of" requires, as pre-requisite to application, proof of the existence of competing causes.

Summary of this case from Normandy Ins. Co. v. Bouayad
Case details for

State v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. DONALD WALKER, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 5, 1992

Citations

593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1992)

Citing Cases

Normandy Ins. Co. v. Bouayad

See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta, 214 So.3d 590, 604 (Fla. 2017) ("Alternatively, to the extent that…

Carter v. State

Carter II, 747 So.2d at 484. Cf. State v. Walker, 593 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 1992) (dismissal of review proper…