From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Vickery

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 3, 1989
536 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1502.

January 3, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Alfonso C. Sepe, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Susan O. Hugentugler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.


The state contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred in imposing a downward departure sentence without offering either oral or written reasons for its departure. See Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11). We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions to resentence the defendant within the guidelines or to impose a departure sentence accompanied by written reasons for the departure. State v. McDavid, 532 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Daughtry v. State, 521 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.


Summaries of

State v. Vickery

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 3, 1989
536 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Vickery

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT VICKERY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 3, 1989

Citations

536 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

Wright argues that the trial court erred in failing to provide written reasons for its departure from the…

State v. Smith

We agree. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989);…