From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Varszegi

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 15, 1995
659 A.2d 184 (Conn. 1995)

Opinion

(15219)

Decided March 15, 1995


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 680 (AC 12599), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Was the defendant deprived of a constitutional right when he was impeached at trial by evidence of a prior conviction that was subsequently reversed on the ground of insufficient evidence?

"2. If there was such a deprivation, was the error harmless?

"3. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that an objective test is employed in determining whether the defendant was entitled to have submitted to the jury the defense of necessity?"


James J. Ruane, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Varszegi

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 15, 1995
659 A.2d 184 (Conn. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Varszegi

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PAUL VARSZEGI

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 15, 1995

Citations

659 A.2d 184 (Conn. 1995)
233 Conn. 912

Citing Cases

Varszegi v. Armstrong

On January 13, 1995, the Appellate Court of Connecticut affirmed the judgment on direct appeal. See State v.…

State v. Varszegi

" (3) "Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that an objective test is employed in determining whether…