From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Vance

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 19, 2015
871 N.W.2d 522 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

holding the young adult defendant's challenge to the mandatory minimum aspect of his sentence was not controlled by Lyle

Summary of this case from State v. Davis

Opinion

No. 15–0070.

08-19-2015

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David Joseph VANCE Jr., Defendant–Appellant.

Marti D. Nerenstone, Council Bluffs, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Wilber, County Attorney, and Margaret Popp–Reyes, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Vance

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 19, 2015
871 N.W.2d 522 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

holding the young adult defendant's challenge to the mandatory minimum aspect of his sentence was not controlled by Lyle

Summary of this case from State v. Davis

rejecting argument that equal protection required extension of the supreme court's juvenile sentencing cases to young adult offenders

Summary of this case from Smith v. State
Case details for

State v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David Joseph VANCE Jr.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Aug 19, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 522 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

In addition, this court has rejected the same argument on several occasions. See, e.g., Thomas v. State, No.…

State v. Dunham

Procedurally defective sentences—as opposed to illegal sentences—focus on how the sentence was imposed rather…