finding no support for the contention that “mere preparation” does not constitute “substantial step” and holding that driving to an arranged meeting place is a substantial step in connection with a charge of attempted contributing to the delinquency of a minor
Summary of this case from United States v. BurghardtNo. A-05-567.
2006
Appeal from the 06 NCA No. 22.
Cases Not Designated for Permanent Publication.
Affirmed.
Sievers, Judge.
finding no support for the contention that “mere preparation” does not constitute “substantial step” and holding that driving to an arranged meeting place is a substantial step in connection with a charge of attempted contributing to the delinquency of a minor
Summary of this case from United States v. BurghardtFull title:State v. Tomek
Court:Nebraska Court of Appeals
Date published: Jan 1, 2006
specially designed for such unlawful use or that can serve no lawful purpose of the actor under the…