From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thebeau

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 5, 1981
405 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1981)

Opinion

Nos. 57943, 57952.

November 5, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John A. Tanksley, J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellant.

Philip Carlton, Jr., Miami, for Thebeau.

William Cagney, Miami, for Bilford.

Eric B. Feldman of Robert A. Spiegel, P.A., Coral Gables, for Garcell.

Frederick Robbins, Miami, for Gonzales and Perez.

William Moran, Miami, for Dicamillo and Araujo.

Robert Josefsberg, Miami, for Howard.


In State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981), and State v. Werner, 402 So.2d 386 (Fla. 1981), we held constitutional section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1979), Florida's drug trafficking law. In addition to those arguments we found to be without merit in Benitez and Werner, appellees in the present consolidated appeals ask us to strike section 893.135 as unconstitutional on another ground. Appellees claim that their right to have a jury determine their guilt or innocence is infringed upon because the judge rather than a jury "may reduce or suspend the sentence if he finds that the defendant rendered such substantial assistance." We note that in most traditional sentencing proceedings in both federal and state courts, this discretionary authority is present in the trial judge, and not the jury, without specific statutory guidelines.

We find appellees' assertions totally without merit, and uphold the constitutional validity of section 893.135. The instant causes are remanded for further proceedings.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Thebeau

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 5, 1981
405 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1981)
Case details for

State v. Thebeau

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT JAMES THEBEAU, APPELLEE. STATE OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 5, 1981

Citations

405 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1981)

Citing Cases

Zarate v. State

See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1279-81 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1884,…

State v. Kaufman

This Court has previously held § 893.135 to be constitutional against numerous attacks on its validity. State…