From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 28, 1988
519 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1988)

Opinion

No. 70788.

January 28, 1988.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for respondent.


We have for review Stanley v. State, 507 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), which notes express conflict with Mitchell v. State, 458 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988), we recently held that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime cannot be used as a reason to depart from the sentencing guidelines.

Accordingly, we approve the decision of the Fifth District and disapprove Mitchell.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 28, 1988
519 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. LEROY STANLEY, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 28, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. State

Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court held in Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988), that the…

Lujan v. State

The sole basis for the upward departure was the quantity of drugs involved in the crime. The quantity of…