From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smulowitz

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 10, 1986
486 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1986)

Summary

affirming reduction of charge pursuant to (c) motion

Summary of this case from Simmons v. State

Opinion

No. 67417.

April 10, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Robert H. Newman, J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

Robert Hall Martin, Miami, for respondent.


This cause is before the Court upon the State of Florida's notice invoking the Court's discretionary jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal rendered in this cause on July 23, 1985. In its opinion the Court certified that its decision passed upon a question of great public importance. After the filing of the notice, this Court relinquished jurisdiction so that the District Court of Appeal could consider a petition for rehearing. Subsequently, the District Court of Appeal granted rehearing and rendered a decision on January 28, 1986. 482 So.2d 1388 (Fla.App. 3 DCA 1986). The District Court of Appeal's decision on rehearing does not certify that its decision passes upon a question of great public importance. We therefore dismiss the State's notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction without prejudice to the right of any party to this cause to seek discretionary review of the decision of the District Court of Appeal on some other jurisdictional ground within thirty days of the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Smulowitz

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 10, 1986
486 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1986)

affirming reduction of charge pursuant to (c) motion

Summary of this case from Simmons v. State
Case details for

State v. Smulowitz

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. MARLOW K. SMULOWITZ, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 10, 1986

Citations

486 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Knox

The filing of the state's traverse did not require a denial of the motion to dismiss because it did not…

Simmons v. State

The defendant's motion to dismiss then was more correctly in the nature of a motion for reduction of the…