From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Skinner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 22, 1981
397 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. SS-165.

April 22, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Ellis T. Fernandez, Jr., J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and A.S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Lacy Mahon, of Mahon, Mahon Farley, Jacksonville, for appellee.


This appeal by the State of Florida from the trial court's order dismissing the information against appellee presents a single issue: Did the trial court commit error in granting appellee's motion to dismiss charges of dealing in stolen property on the ground that the property alleged to have been stolen was, in fact, not stolen property?

Subsequent to the ruling here complained of, this court ruled upon the identical issue in Padgett v. State, 378 So.2d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). That case holds that in a prosecution under Section 812.019, Florida Statutes (1977), proof of the stolen character of the goods is not essential to proof of the offense of "endeavoring to traffic in stolen property" (378 So.2d at 119). See Section 812.028, Florida Statutes (1977), and State v. Dickinson, 370 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1979).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Skinner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 22, 1981
397 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

State v. Skinner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. LEANDER ALEXANDER SKINNER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 22, 1981

Citations

397 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

We are of the opinion that there is no substantial difference between "soliciting" to traffic in stolen…

State v. Rios

This analysis is fully supported by recent decisions of the First and Fourth District Courts of Appeal with…