From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Siddal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 24, 1999
728 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-1354

Opinion filed March 24, 1999. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1999

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Manuel A. Crespo, Judge; L.T. No. 94-31394.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.


Although we understand the trial court's intentions in imposing a downward departure sentence, the State's position is correct and the downward departure is not legally sustainable. As a consequence, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for resentencing within the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Whiting, 711 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Siddal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 24, 1999
728 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Siddal

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. JOSEPH SIDDAL, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 24, 1999

Citations

728 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. Rife

Additionally, the Third District, citing to the Second District's opinion in Whiting, reversed a downward…