From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Santiago

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 29, 1998
713 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 96-2818

Opinion filed July 29, 1998 JULY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Stanton S. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. No. 95-022097 CF 10A.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

H. Dohn Williams, Jr. of H. Dohn Williams, Jr., P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We reverse an order dismissing the charges against Appellee on the grounds that section 322.34(1)(a), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional. The issue here is the same as that recently resolved in State v. Keirn, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1144 (Fla. 4th DCA May 6, 1998), in which we concluded that said statute is constitutional.

We remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion inKeirn.

STONE, C.J., KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Santiago

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 29, 1998
713 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. RENIEL SANTIAGO, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 29, 1998

Citations

713 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Raulerson v. State

We have for review the Fifth District Court of Appeal's decision in Raulerson v. State, 699 So.2d 339 (Fla.…