From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 24, 1986
28 Ohio St. 3d 65 (Ohio 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-1129

Decided December 24, 1986.

Criminal law — Private possession or control of material showing minor participating or engaging in sexual activity — R.C. 2907.323(A)(3).

APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Greene County.

William F. Schenck, prosecuting attorney, for the state.

Carretta, Cartwright, Barber Cornish Co., L.P.A., and Catherine M. Barber, for George and Linda Robinson.


The judgment of the court of appeals in case Nos. 85 CA 47 and 85 CA 48, with respect to its ruling on R.C. 2907.323(A)(3), is reversed on authority of State v. Meadows (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 43, and that issue is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

The judgment of the court of appeals in case Nos. 85 CA 47 and 85 CA 48, with respect to its ruling on R.C. 2907.323(A)(1) and (2), is vacated and these issues are remanded to the trial court for reconsideration in light of State v. Meadows, supra.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

SWEENEY, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 24, 1986
28 Ohio St. 3d 65 (Ohio 1986)
Case details for

State v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. ROBINSON ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 24, 1986

Citations

28 Ohio St. 3d 65 (Ohio 1986)
502 N.E.2d 634

Citing Cases

State v. Young

However, shortly after Meadows was decided, this court issued judgment entries in two cases involving R.C.…

State v. Beavers

However, based on the authority of State v. Meadows, 28 Ohio St.3d 43 (1986), the Supreme Court of Ohio…