From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Riley

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 10, 2009
26 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 2009)

Opinion

No. SC08-2116.

December 10, 2009.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, First District — Case No. 1D08-802 (Leon County).

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Michael T. Kennett, and Anne Catherine Conley, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.

Joshua Byrne Spector of Perlman, Yevoli and Albright, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.


This Court initially accepted jurisdiction to review Riley v. State, 25 So.3d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), a decision in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the following question to be of great public importance:

BASED ON THE REASONING OF GALINDEZ V. STATE, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla. 2007), MAY A COURT FIND THAT THE FAILURE TO INSTRUCT THE JURY ON THE NEXT LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE CONSTITUTES HARMLESS ERROR?

Id. at 4. After further consideration, this Court concludes that it should decline to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Riley

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 10, 2009
26 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 2009)
Case details for

State v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Eddie RILEY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

26 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 2009)

Citing Cases

Clark v. ST

Sanders v. State, 946 So.2d 953, 959 (Fla. 2006). See Riley v. State, 25 So.3d 1, 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), rev.…

Towbridge v. State

The fact a petitioner could have, but did not present an issue in his pro se brief on direct appeal does not…