From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rhames

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 18, 1986
494 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1986)

Opinion

No. 67557.

September 18, 1986.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions; First District — Case No. BA-163.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Neal T. McShane, Orlando, for respondent.


On February 5, 1986, this Court entered its order accepting jurisdiction and dispensing with oral argument. We have now determined that the Court is without jurisdiction and, therefore, the petition for review is denied.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

ADKINS and SHAW, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

State v. Rhames

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 18, 1986
494 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Rhames

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. DONALD WAYNE RHAMES, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 18, 1986

Citations

494 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Dietz

Relatedly, other courts have permitted the transcripts of such tape recordings to be taken into the jury…

Edwards v. State

But here, the victim positively identified appellant at trial as her assailant. See Springer. Cf. Rhames v.…