From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Potts

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 31, 1988
526 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1988)

Opinion

No. 71765.

June 2, 1988. Rehearing Dismissed August 31, 1988.

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Lee Rosenthal and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We have on appeal Potts v. State, 526 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which declared unconstitutional a portion of section 790.07(2), Florida Statutes (1985). Jurisdiction is mandatory. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Having reviewed the entire record in this case, we have determined that the district court's decision below is an eminently correct statement of the law. The state through its criminal process may not penalize someone merely for the status of being under indictment or otherwise accused of a crime, as it has attempted to do here. We therefore approve and adopt the district court's opinion in its entirety as our own. Section 790.07(2), Florida Statutes (1985), is facially unconstitutional to the extent it purports to penalize a person who is under indictment with greater severity than one who is accused of no crime.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Potts

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 31, 1988
526 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Potts

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. WILLIE POTTS, JR., APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 31, 1988

Citations

526 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1988)

Citing Cases

Yisrael v. State

Consideration of pending or dismissed charges during sentencing results in a denial of the defendant's due…

Whitehead v. State

The defendant makes two arguments in this appeal. First, he argues the trial court improperly considered a…