Summary
perceiving no conflict between a statute making it unlawful for licensee to sell alcohol to minors "'knowing them to be such'" and local ordinance providing that "'[n]o person shall, within the city,' sell any alcoholic liquors to minors"
Summary of this case from State ex Rel. City of Alma v. Furnas Cty. FarmsOpinion
No. 31,407.
April 23, 1937.
Defendant appealed from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, Edwin J. Kenny, Judge, in favor of the State. Affirmed, following State v. Penn Mut. L. Ins. Co. 198 Minn. 115, 269 N.W. 37.
James E. Gardner and Fryberger, Fulton Boyle, for appellant.
Thomas J. Naylor, County Attorney, for the State.
Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on appeal from the order denying a new trial, and our opinion was filed September 25, 1936. 198 Minn. 115, 269 N.W. 37.
For the reasons given in said opinion and upon authority thereof, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.