From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pendergrass

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 31, 2008
997 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 1D08-311.

December 31, 2008.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Hugh A. Carithers, Judge.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Robert B. Lippelman, Assistant State Attorney, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Jenna Dean Lopes, Jacksonville, for Appellee.


Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order granting Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Information Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.140(g). Both Appellant and Appellee acknowledge that the circumstances of this appeal present a question of mootness. We conclude that because Appellant refiled the information, any potential defects under rule 3.140(g) were cured, thus making it impossible for this court to provide any effectual relief to the parties. As a result, we dismiss the appeal as moot and reject the parties' assertions that the case falls within the exceptions to dismissal. see Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992) (noting three exceptions where an otherwise moot case will not be dismissed).

DISMISSED.

BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Pendergrass

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 31, 2008
997 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

State v. Pendergrass

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Curtis Eugene PENDERGRASS, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 31, 2008

Citations

997 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

McGuire v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

And the court noted that McGuire “essentially admit[ted] that he was not prejudiced because, even if the…