From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Navarro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 12, 1992
603 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-2122.

August 12, 1992.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Broward County, John A. Frusciante, J.

B.J. Cummins of Cummins, Bass and Diaz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent-Honorable John A. Frusciante.


Petitioner seeks review of the trial court's order revoking his bond and committing him to pretrial custody.

Petitioner was charged with burglary of a conveyance and was released pursuant to a pretrial intervention program. Subsequently, while still in the pretrial intervention program, petitioner was charged with possession of a short-barreled shotgun and was released after posting a $1,000 bond. Thereafter, at a hearing on a motion for a defense continuance, the trial court revoked petitioner's bond, indicating that it has a policy to refuse bond on charges allegedly committed while the defendant is already on release pending resolution of another criminal proceeding. The court did not find that petitioner is unlikely to appear in court for further proceedings.

The trial court's stated policy is contrary to section 907.041, Florida Statutes (1991). See also and compare Gomez v. Hinckley, 473 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); § 903.046, Fla. Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.131(a). Accordingly, we agree with petitioner that habeas relief is appropriate.

We reject the state's contention that the clerical mistake in petitioner's address resulted in the revocation of bail. We also note that the state's reliance on rule 3.131(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, is misplaced, as that rule is applicable only after trial has begun. Also, the dicta in Harp v. Hinckley, 410 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), upon which the state relies was superseded by section 907.041, Florida Statutes (1991).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand with instructions to the trial court to hold a hearing and to set reasonable bond for petitioner within 48 hours of receipt of this opinion.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Navarro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 12, 1992
603 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. HOWARD NEICEN, PETITIONER, v. NICK NAVARRO, AS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 12, 1992

Citations

603 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Metzger v. Cochran

The trial court has the authority under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(g)(1) to arrest and commit a…

Houser v. Manning

II. Defendant contends that he is entitled to release on bond under the rule announced in State ex rel.…