From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Muhammad

Supreme Court of Washington.
Oct 31, 2018
191 Wn. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018)

Opinion

No. 96090-9

10-31-2018

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Bisir Bilal MUHAMMAD, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu (Justice Johnson sat for Justice Madsen and Justice Wiggins sat for Justice González), considered at its October 30, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted. Review is also granted of the issues raised in the answer to the petition for review. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Muhammad

Supreme Court of Washington.
Oct 31, 2018
191 Wn. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Muhammad

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Bisir Bilal MUHAMMAD, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

191 Wn. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018)
191 Wash. 2d 1019
428 P.3d 1177

Citing Cases

State v. Muhammad

The Court of Appeals affirmed on exigency grounds. State v. Muhammad , 4 Wash. App. 2d 31, 50, 419 P.3d 419,…