From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Molina

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 21, 1992
600 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2285.

June 16, 1992. Rehearing Denied July 21, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Steve Levine, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Schreiber, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


This case is controlled by State v. Alexander, 591 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), where we held on similar facts that a finding by a trial judge that a defendant is "motivated to treatment" as a mentally disordered sex offender, unlike a strong motivation for rehabilitation, is an insufficient reason to support a downward departure from the guideline sentence.

Accordingly, we vacate the sentence entered and remand for further proceedings where the defendant shall be sentenced within the guidelines or be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea and go to trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Molina

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 21, 1992
600 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Molina

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. JOSE MOLINA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 21, 1992

Citations

600 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

State v. Tiedge

We conclude that the order must be reversed under authority of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990), and…

State v. Cruz

At that time, the trial court may resentence the appellee within the sentencing guidelines, or allow him to…