From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Meyers

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 28, 1933
166 A. 75 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Submitted February 17, 1933 —

Decided April 28, 1933.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 1174.

For the defendant in error, John N. Drewen.

For the plaintiff in error, Jacob S. Glickenhaus.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Meyers

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 28, 1933
166 A. 75 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

State v. Meyers

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LOUIS MEYERS, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 28, 1933

Citations

166 A. 75 (N.J. 1933)
166 A. 75

Citing Cases

State v. Hock

" L. 1925, c. 207. Two cases held that allegation and proof of concealment were required under that language…

State v. Emery

The one substantial basis for an argument for reversal, that the verdict upon which judgment of conviction…