From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McKnight

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 13, 2000
764 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 2000)

Summary

affirming this court's decision that it could correct as fundamental error McKnight's 10-year habitual felony offender sentence for possession of cocaine noting this error was "correctable during the window period discussed in Maddox."

Summary of this case from Brannon v. State

Opinion

No. SC94256

Opinion filed July 13, 2000

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, First District — Case No. 1D97-1845, (Duval County).

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review McKnight v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2402 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 23, 1998), a decision of the First District Court of Appeal certifying conflict with the decision of the Fifth District in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

McKnight received a ten-year habitual offender sentence for possession of cocaine. A habitual offender sentence for possession of cocaine is expressly prohibited by statute and the sentence imposed exceeds the maximum non-habitual offender sentence permitted for the offense. See McKnight, 23 Fla. L. Weekly at D2402. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox, we approve the decision of the First District that this constitutes fundamental error correctable during the window period discussed in Maddox.

See also Leonard v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S377, S378 n. 4 (Fla. May 11, 2000) (rejecting State's argument that a fundamental sentencing error should remain uncorrected simply because the erroneous sentence is to be served concurrently with other sentences that are not being challenged).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., recused.


Summaries of

State v. McKnight

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 13, 2000
764 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 2000)

affirming this court's decision that it could correct as fundamental error McKnight's 10-year habitual felony offender sentence for possession of cocaine noting this error was "correctable during the window period discussed in Maddox."

Summary of this case from Brannon v. State
Case details for

State v. McKnight

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. TERRY McKNIGHT, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 13, 2000

Citations

764 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 2000)

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

A defendant who is convicted of a drug offense falling within this category is ineligible for a habitual…

Seccia v. State

However, it appears to us that the supreme court has already rejected such an argument. See Leonard v. State,…