From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McCauley

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 31, 1932
144 So. 243 (La. 1932)

Opinion

No. 31983.

October 31, 1932.

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; E.P. Mills, Judge.

Thomas W. Robertson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O'Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., Nash Johnson, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport, and James O'Niell, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the State.


The appellant was convicted of breaking and entering a store, in the nighttime, with intent to commit larceny. The only bill of exceptions in the record has reference to a statement made by the district attorney to the defendant, on cross-examination, viz.: "Now you know that you had stopped off in Shreveport on your way to pull a job of robbery at McComb City, Miss." The objection made to the statement was that there was no evidence of any such fact, and that the statement of the supposed fact was prejudicial to the defendant. The judge sustained the objection and immediately instructed the jury to disregard the statement of the district attorney, and to draw no inference from it prejudicial to the defendant. We have no reason to doubt that the judge's prompt admonition to the jury served its purpose, or that the defendant was not prejudiced by the district attorney's statement.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. McCauley

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 31, 1932
144 So. 243 (La. 1932)
Case details for

State v. McCauley

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMES E. McCAULEY

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 31, 1932

Citations

144 So. 243 (La. 1932)
144 So. 243

Citing Cases

State v. Davidson

[13,14] We have stated that courts have the inherent power to do those things reasonably necessary for the…