From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Levasseur

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 22, 1982
411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

In State v. Levasseur, 411 So.2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the defendant was a visitor to a house that was the subject of a search warrant for quaaludes. He asked permission to leave.

Summary of this case from State v. Hendrix

Opinion

No. AE-213.

March 22, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Alachua County, Chester B. Chance, J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.


The State appeals an order of the Circuit Court of Alachua County which granted appellee's motion to suppress certain evidence. We reverse.

Officer Jempson assisted other officers in the execution of a search warrant of a residence. Appellee was one of the people in the house when the officers entered it. The officers determined that appellee and others did not reside at the residence and were going to allow them to leave. At that point, appellee asked to go into the back bedroom to get his shoes, and Jempson accompanied him. Appellee put on his shoes and then grabbed a blue windbreaker jacket off the bed. As he did so, Jempson noticed that there was a bulge in the jacket and it swayed as if weighted down. Jempson took the jacket from appellee, fearing that there was a weapon in it, and felt it for a weapon. He felt no weapon but felt tablets that appeared to be some kind of drug tablets and asked appellee to remove the package from the jacket. When appellee did so, Jempson saw tablets, which, based on his experience, appeared to be quaaludes. Appellant contends the search was pursuant to a valid search warrant. Appellee raises no question as to the validity of the warrant but contends Jempson had no authority to search the jacket. We disagree.

The search warrant directs the search of the residence and curtilage thereof for methaqualone. The jacket, which was lying on the bed before appellant picked it up, was an article in the residence which was subject to search pursuant to the warrant. The quaaludes (methaqualone) were validly seized pursuant to the warrant.

REVERSED.

McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Levasseur

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 22, 1982
411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

In State v. Levasseur, 411 So.2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the defendant was a visitor to a house that was the subject of a search warrant for quaaludes. He asked permission to leave.

Summary of this case from State v. Hendrix
Case details for

State v. Levasseur

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ROD WAYNE LEVASSEUR, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 22, 1982

Citations

411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Richards

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress because the search of…

State v. Hendrix

Therefore, the appellate court reviews a trial court's factual findings to determine whether they are…