From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lebrick

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 28, 2018
328 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

02-28-2018

STATE of Connecticut v. Horvil F. LEBRICK

Raymond L. Durelli, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Raymond L. Durelli, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 179 Conn. App. 221, 178 A.3d 106 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly admitted the probable cause hearing testimony of Keisha Parks?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly admitted the testimony of James Stephenson?"

KAHN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Lebrick

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 28, 2018
328 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Lebrick

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Horvil F. LEBRICK

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 28, 2018

Citations

328 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2018)
179 A.3d 218

Citing Cases

State v. Sinclair

Like the Second Circuit, we "think it sufficient to conclude that we must rely on Supreme Court precedent…

State v. Lebrick

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly admitted the testimony of…