From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Komisarjevsky

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 8, 2011
21 A.3d 465 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

Decided June 8, 2011


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 33360) is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Does the trial court's decision to grant an intervenor's motion to unseal a `witness list' constitute a final judgment permitting interlocutory review?
"2. If the decision is an appealable final judgment, did the trial court improperly grant the intervenor's motion to unseal the `witness list?'"
ROGERS, C. J., and NORCOTT and ZARELLA, Js., would deny the defendant's petition for certification for appeal.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18797.

Walter C. Bansley III, Jeremiah Donovan and Todd A. Bussert, in support of the petition.
Harry Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, and William S. Fish, Jr., Michael C. Sorensen and Amy E. Markim, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Komisarjevsky

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 8, 2011
21 A.3d 465 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Komisarjevsky

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSHUA KOMISARJEVSKY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 8, 2011

Citations

21 A.3d 465 (Conn. 2011)
21 A.3d 465

Citing Cases

State v. Komisarjevsky

" This court had granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the issues of…

State v. Joshua Komisarjevsky.

The defendant, Joshua Komisarjevsky, appeals from the Appellate Court's judgment dismissing, for lack of a…