From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. J.R.S.C.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 1, 2001
788 So. 2d 424 (La. 2001)

Summary

noting that the sole difference between motions under the Ch. C. art. 909 and C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 "is that the juvenile may file his motion to modify the judgment of disposition at any time while the disposition is in force, whereas an adult offender's motion to reconsider sentence must be filed within 30 days of original sentencing unless the trial court enlarges that time period."

Summary of this case from In re A.N.

Opinion

No. 2000-CK-2108

June 1, 2001.

IN RE: J.R.S.C.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Juvenile Court of East Baton Rouge, No. 77,238; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 00 KW 1048

Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, to the First Circuit Court of Appeal, Parish of East Baton Rouge.


Granted with order. See attached per curiam.

RLL

PFC

CDK

CDT

JTK

PCC


Granted. This case is remanded to the juvenile court for consideration of relator's motion to modify the judgment of disposition. The provisions of the Children's Code "shall be liberally construed to the end that each child and parent coming within the jurisdiction of the court shall be accorded due process and that each child shall receive . . . the care, guidance, and control that will be conducive to his welfare." La.Ch.C. art. 102. La.R.S. 15:906 (A)(2) further provides that it is the "public policy of this state that commitment of a juvenile to the care of the [Department of Corrections] is not punitive nor in anywise to be construed as a penal sentence, but as a step in the total treatment process toward rehabilitation of the juvenile . ." We therefore consider a juvenile's motion to modify the judgment of disposition pursuant to La.Ch.C. art. 909 the equivalent of a motion to reconsider sentence filed by an adult offender pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 for purposes of La.C.Cr.P. art. 916 (3), which permits a district court to "[c]orrect an illegal sentence or take other appropriate action pursuant to a properly made or filed motion to reconsider sentence" despite the pendency of an appeal. The sole difference between the two motions is that the juvenile may file his motion to modify the judgment of disposition at any time while the disposition is in force, whereas an adult offender's motion to reconsider sentence must be filed within 30 days of original sentencing unless the trial court enlarges that time period. La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 (A)(1).

VICTORY, J., concurs.


Summaries of

State v. J.R.S.C.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 1, 2001
788 So. 2d 424 (La. 2001)

noting that the sole difference between motions under the Ch. C. art. 909 and C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 "is that the juvenile may file his motion to modify the judgment of disposition at any time while the disposition is in force, whereas an adult offender's motion to reconsider sentence must be filed within 30 days of original sentencing unless the trial court enlarges that time period."

Summary of this case from In re A.N.

In J.R.S.C., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that it is the "public policy of this state that commitment of a juvenile to the care of the [Department of Corrections] is not punitive nor in anyway to be construed as a penal sentence, but as a step in the total treatment process toward rehabilitation of the juvenile...". Id. at 424.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. C.H., 03-1279
Case details for

State v. J.R.S.C.

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. J.R.S.C

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 1, 2001

Citations

788 So. 2d 424 (La. 2001)

Citing Cases

In re State in the Interest T. J.

"The trial court retains the power to modify a disposition at any time the disposition is in force. See State…

State v. Thomas

State v. Simmons, 00-1037 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2/28/01), 781 So.2d 821; State v. Schieffler, 00-1166 (La.App.…