Summary
listing factors that defendant must prove to show he had subjective expectation of privacy as: “ his relationship with the location was personal in nature, his relationship with the location was more than sporadic, irregular or inconsequential, and he maintained the location and the items within it in a private manner at the time of the search”
Summary of this case from State v. PierreOpinion
Decided May 18, 2000
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 156 (AC 18405), is denied.
NORCOTT and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Del Atwell, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Lawrence J. Tytla, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.