From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Huntington

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 29, 1964
204 A.2d 411 (Conn. 1964)

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1964

Decided October 29, 1964

Information charging the defendant with the crime of selling obscene literature, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the court, Covello, J.; judgment of guilty and appeal by the defendant. Error; further proceedings.

Joseph F. Skelley, Jr., for the appellant (defendant).

John D. LaBelle, state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were George D. Stoughton and Harry W. Hultgren, Jr., assistant state's attorneys, for the appellee (state).


The defendant was found guilty as charged in a trial to the court. General Statutes § 53-243.

Counsel agreed in open court that the issues involved in this appeal have been decided by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein, 378 U.S. 577, 84 S.Ct. 1909, 12 L.Ed.2d 1035. From an examination of the several opinions of the justices in that case, we conclude that a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States hold that the particular publication in issue before us is not sufficiently obscene to forfeit the protection of the first amendment to the federal constitution. In view of that decision, the issues on this appeal, being entirely directed to that principal question, have been conclusively determined in favor of the defendant. We therefore do not pass upon the issues and, solely in deference to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, hold that the trial court erred.


Summaries of

State v. Huntington

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 29, 1964
204 A.2d 411 (Conn. 1964)
Case details for

State v. Huntington

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. TRUMBULL HUNTINGTON

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 29, 1964

Citations

204 A.2d 411 (Conn. 1964)
204 A.2d 411

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Robin

The Supreme Court of the United States held in Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein, 378 U.S. 577, 12 L.Ed.2d 1035,…

State v. Menillo

In view of our interpretation of those cases, taking into consideration the literal meaning of the language…