From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 25, 1983
432 So. 2d 865 (La. 1983)

Summary

vacating a condition of probation that ordered the amount of restitution to be set by the probation department

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Francis

Opinion

No. 82-KA-2840.

May 25, 1983.

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE SHIRLEY G. WIMBERLY, J.

William J. Guste, Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., John H. Craft, James Letten, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff.

Brod Bagert, New Orleans, for defendant.


Preston Hardy was charged by bill of information with three counts of receiving stolen things in violation of La.R.S. 14:69. The state amended count one of the bill of information so as to aggregate the values of the stolen goods, and nolle prosequied counts two and three. Defendant then pleaded guilty to the amended bill of information. The trial court sentenced defendant to serve three years in the custody of the department of corrections, execution of said sentence being suspended on the condition that defendant serve three years active probation and that he pay $74.00 court costs, $100.00 to the criminal court fund, a $100.00 fine, and make restitution in an amount to be determined by the probation department.

As part of defendant's probated sentence he was ordered to make restitution with the amount and payments to be determined by the Probation Department. When a trial judge suspends the imposition or execution of a sentence and places the defendant on probation he has the power to require defendant to:

(7) Make reasonable reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for damage or loss caused by his offense in an amount to be determined by the court; . . . . La. C.Cr.P. Art. 895(A)(7) (emphasis added).

This article requires the court to set the amount of restitution and no codal provision gives the probation department concomitant powers. See also, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 895.1. In this respect the sentence is illegal and the case should be remanded for resentencing in accordance with the applicable law.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.


Summaries of

State v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 25, 1983
432 So. 2d 865 (La. 1983)

vacating a condition of probation that ordered the amount of restitution to be set by the probation department

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Francis

In State v. Hardy, 432 So.2d 865 (La. 1983), the supreme court remanded the case with instructions to modify the condition of probation to specify the amount of the supervision fee within the range allowed under La. Code Crim.P. art. 895.1.

Summary of this case from State v. Alexander
Case details for

State v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. PRESTON HARDY

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 25, 1983

Citations

432 So. 2d 865 (La. 1983)

Citing Cases

State v. Alexander

Because the court failed to determine the amount of restitution owed as a special condition of probation, the…

U.S. v. Francis

Louisiana cases prohibit sentencing courts from delegating their authority to impose conditions of probation.…