From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 28, 1969
253 S.C. 294 (S.C. 1969)

Opinion

18969

October 28, 1969.

Messrs. Wofford Snyder, of Greenville, for Appellant, cite: As to error on part of trial Judge in failing to charge the law of involuntary manslaughter: 218 S.C. 415, 63 S.E.2d 57; 123 Ky. 95, 40 Am. Jur.2d 362, Homicide, Sec. 70; 168 S.C. 76, 167 S.E. 19; 208 S.C. 462, 38 S.E.2d 492; 235 S.C. 301, 111 S.E.2d 560; 87 S.C. 532, 70 S.E. 306; 190 S.C. 208, 2 S.E.2d 391. As to burden of proof being on the State, and an accused is not required to carry the burden of proving his defense: 398 F.2d 111, cert. den. 89 S.Ct. 483; 398 U.S. 253; 393 U.S. 268; 291 U.S. 217, 54 S.Ct. 434.

B.O. Thomason, Jr., Esq., Solicitor, of Greenville, for Respondent, cites: As to the evidence in the case not permitting an inference that the Defendant could be guilty of involuntary manslaughter: (S.C.) 168 S.E.2d 564; 235 S.C. 301, 111 S.E.2d 560; 242 S.C. 372, 131 S.E.2d 96; (S.C.) 161 S.E.2d 230. As to rule that a plea of self-defense be proved by the greater weight or preponderance of the testimony: 208 S.C. 297, 38 S.E.2d 715; 202 S.C. 473, 25 S.E.2d 561; 91 S.C. 235, 74 S.E. 502.


October 28, 1969.


The defendant Alvin Brooks Hall was indicted for the crime of murder and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. He contends in this appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge erred (1) in the instructions to the jury relative to the burden of proof on the plea of self-defense and (2) in failing to submit, with appropriate instructions, the issue of involuntary manslaughter. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

The defendant did not raise the objections to the instructions at the trial, although full opportunity was afforded to do so in compliance with the provisions of Section 10-1210 of the 1962 Code of Laws (also appearing as Section 17-513.1). The failure of defendant to object or to request additional instructions, when opportunity was afforded, constituted a waiver of any right to complain on appeal of errors in the charge.

Affirmed.

MOSS, C.J., and BUSSEY, BRAILSFORD and LITTLEJOHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 28, 1969
253 S.C. 294 (S.C. 1969)
Case details for

State v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:The STATE, Respondent, v. Alvin Brooks HALL, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 28, 1969

Citations

253 S.C. 294 (S.C. 1969)
170 S.E.2d 379

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

ffectiveassistance of counsel at trial: 263 S.C. 50, 208 S.E.2d 256; 407 U.S. 25; 397 U.S. 759; 241 S.C. 40,…

State v. Todd

ker, Asst. Atty.Gen., and Richard P. Wilson, Staff Atty., of Columbia, for Respondent, cite: As to the Trial…