From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fruetel

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 16, 1993
629 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1993)

Opinion

No. 81165.

December 16, 1993.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Criminal Law and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Anthony C. Musto, Miami, for respondent.


We review the decision of the district court of appeal in Fruetel v. State, 609 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of certified conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The decision under review is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993), and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Fruetel

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 16, 1993
629 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Fruetel

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. PATRICIA FRUETEL, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 16, 1993

Citations

629 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1993)