From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fraser

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 10, 1990
564 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-03256.

August 10, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Crockett Farnell, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellee.


The state challenges the downward guidelines departure sentence imposed upon the appellee, Peter Fraser. The state alleges and Fraser concedes, that the trial court failed to provide written reasons justifying the downward departure. Recently, in Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990), the Florida Supreme Court held that upon remand for failure to provide written reasons, the trial court must resentence the offender within the recommended guidelines range. Although Pope was an upward departure, this court, in State v. Cook, 15 F.L.W. 1822 (Fla.2d DCA July 13, 1990), applied Pope in a downward departure setting.

We must, therefore, reverse Fraser's sentence and remand for resentencing, pursuant to the guidelines. In all other aspects, this matter is affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Fraser

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 10, 1990
564 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Fraser

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. PETER NORMAN FRASER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 10, 1990

Citations

564 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

State v. Waldo

Allen. If the appellee elects to proceed to sentencing without the unacceptable conditions, he must be…

State v. McCall

Because no written reasons were provided, on remand, the trial court must resentence within the guidelines.…