From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fouts

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 16, 1929
276 P. 683 (Or. 1929)

Opinion

Argued April 3, 1929

Affirmed April 16, 1929

From Washington: GEORGE R. BAGLEY, Judge.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of Mr. E.B. Tongue, District Attorney, and Mr. P.L. Patterson, Deputy District Attorney, with an oral argument by Mr. Tongue.

For respondent there was no appearance.


AFFIRMED.


This case involves the question of whether or not a person receiving from another a bottle of intoxicating liquor for the mere purpose of taking a drink therefrom, and then returning the bottle, is guilty of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The learned circuit judge ruled against the state from which the district attorney has appealed. The learned district attorney presented a cogent and logical argument for reversing the ruling of the Circuit Court. The case is controlled, however, by the case of State v. Williams, 117 Or. 238 ( 243 P. 563). The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Fouts

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 16, 1929
276 P. 683 (Or. 1929)
Case details for

State v. Fouts

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. OLGA FOUTS

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 16, 1929

Citations

276 P. 683 (Or. 1929)
276 P. 683

Citing Cases

State v. Gordineer

The offering of alcoholic drink for immediate consumption does not place the person accepting the drink in…

Ibach v. Jackson

It is argued by defendant that plaintiff's original complaint was predicated upon some alleged violation of…