From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Epperson

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jul 26, 1967
242 Ark. 922 (Ark. 1967)

Opinion

No. 5-4127

Opinion delivered June 5, 1967 [Rehearing denied July 26, 1967.]

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — STATE'S POWERS FUNCTIONS — STATUTE SPECIFYING CURRICULUM IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS VALID EXERCISE OF. — Initiated Measure No. 1 of 1928 [Ark. Stat. Ann. 80-1627 and 80-1628 (Repl. 1960)] held a valid exercise of the state's power to specify the curriculum in its public schools, although no opinion expressed as to the theory involved, the answer not being necessary to the decision, and the issue not having been raised.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court, Murray O. Reed, Chancellor reversed and dismissed.

Bruce Bennett, Attorney General Fletcher Jackson, Asst. Atty. General, for appellant.

Warren Bullion, for appellee.


Upon the principal issue, that of constitutionality, the court holds that Initiated Measure No. 1 of 1928, Ark. Stat. Ann. 80-1627 and 80-1628 (Repl. 1960), is a valid exercise of the state's power to specify the curriculum in its public schools. The court expresses no opinion on the question whether the Act prohibits any explanation of the theory of evolution or merely prohibits teaching that the theory is true; the answer not being necessary to a decision in the case, and the issue not having been raised.

The decree is reversed and the cause dismissed.

WARD, J., concurs. Brown, J., dissents.

PAUL WARD, Justice, concurring. I agree with the first sentence in the majority opinion.

To my mind, the rest of the opinion beclouds the clear announcement made in the first sentence.


Summaries of

State v. Epperson

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jul 26, 1967
242 Ark. 922 (Ark. 1967)
Case details for

State v. Epperson

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. Susan EPPERSON and N. H. Blanchard

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 26, 1967

Citations

242 Ark. 922 (Ark. 1967)
416 S.W.2d 322

Citing Cases

Jegley v. Picado

We have not always required prosecution or a specific threat of prosecution as a prerequisite for challenging…