From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dorsey

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 26, 2019
275 So. 3d 874 (La. 2019)

Opinion

No. 2019-K-0349

06-26-2019

STATE of Louisiana v. Adrian A. DORSEY a/k/a Adrian Anton Dorsey on Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal Third Circuit, Parish of Beauregard


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF BEAUREGARD

PER CURIAM

Writ granted. The court of appeal erred in finding as an error patent that the district court did not adhere to the 24-hour statutory sentencing delay required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 873. See State v. Dorsey , 18-0250 (La. App. 3 Cir. 11/7/18), 260 So.3d 616. Whether the article requires a 24-hour sentencing delay between the denial of post-verdict motions and the commencement of a habitual offender adjudication, whether the article was violated under the circumstances here where the imposition of sentence did not occur until three weeks after the habitual offender adjudication, and whether defendant was prejudiced as a result are complex questions that cannot and should not be resolved in errors patent review. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeal, reinstate the sentence, and remand to the court of appeal for consideration of the pretermitted claims.

REVERSED AND REMANDED


Summaries of

State v. Dorsey

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 26, 2019
275 So. 3d 874 (La. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Dorsey

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ADRIAN A. DORSEY A/K/A ADRIAN ANTON DORSEY

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

275 So. 3d 874 (La. 2019)

Citing Cases

State v. Dorsey

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: In State v. Dorsey , 18-250, pp. 1-4 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/7/18), 260 So.3d 616,…

State v. Dorsey

Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeal, reinstate the sentence, and remand to the court of appeal for…