From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dojnia

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 24, 2019
333 Conn. 914 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

09-24-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Jodi M. DOJNIA

Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, and James P. Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Brett R. Aiello, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, and James P. Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Brett R. Aiello, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 190 Conn. App. 353, 210 A.3d 586 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that General Statutes §§ 1-1f (b) and 53a-60b (a) (1) were not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence the state presented at trial was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was ‘physically disabled’ under the governing statutes?"

ROBINSON, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Dojnia

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 24, 2019
333 Conn. 914 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Dojnia

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Jodi M. DOJNIA

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 24, 2019

Citations

333 Conn. 914 (Conn. 2019)
215 A.3d 1211

Citing Cases

State v. Jodi D.

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence the state presented at trial was…

State v. Rivera

" (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Dojnia , 190 Conn. App. 353, 371–72, 210 A.3d 586, cert.…