From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Delvalle

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 8, 1999
745 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

finding an order granting the defendant's rule 3.800 motion was not a final order where the defendant had not been resentenced and judicial labor was still required

Summary of this case from State v. Gaines

Opinion

No. 99-0981.

Opinion filed December 8, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter M. Weinstein, Judge; L.T. No. 95-6454 CF10A.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carlos Delvalle, Florida City, pro se.


The State attempts to appeal the trial court's order granting the Defendant's 3.800(a) motion, even though the Defendant has yet to be resentenced. The State argues that this Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(M) and section 924.066(2) of the Florida Statutes. We disagree.

Rule 9.140(c)(1) enumerates several types of orders from which the State may appeal in a criminal case. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(M), the "catch-all" provision, allows the State to appeal an order "as otherwise provided by general law from final orders." Section 924.066(2) provides, "Either the state or a prisoner in custody may obtain review in the next higher state court of a trial court's adverse ruling granting or denying collateral relief." Read in conjunction, Rule 9.140(c)(1)(M) and section 924.066(2) allow the State to appeal from a final order granting collateral relief.

Here, while the trial court has granted the Defendant's 3.800(a) motion, it has not and will not grant the Defendant any collateral relief until it resentences him. The order granting the Defendant's 3.800(a) motion is not a final order, as judicial labor, i.e., resentencing, is still required. Until the Defendant is resentenced, this Court cannot properly determine whether the trial court has erred. Accordingly, the State's appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the State to timely appeal the resentencing order.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Delvalle

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 8, 1999
745 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

finding an order granting the defendant's rule 3.800 motion was not a final order where the defendant had not been resentenced and judicial labor was still required

Summary of this case from State v. Gaines
Case details for

State v. Delvalle

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. CARLOS DELVALLE, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 8, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

Affirmed. Melton v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly D1296 (Fla. 1st DCA May 29, 2020) (holding that because…

Wright v. State

Affirmed. See Melton v. State, 2020 WL 2781862 (Fla. 1st DCA May 29, 2020) (holding that because resentencing…