From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Custodio

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 6, 2011
17 A.2d 70 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

Decided April 6, 2011


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 539 (AC 32527), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 54-56d, as amended by Public Acts 1998, No. 98-88, § 2, applied retroactively?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had properly exercised in personam jurisdiction over the defendant, when it was conceded that the defendant had no notice of the proceeding which resulted in an arrest warrant for failure to appear?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering periodic competency exams when there was no possibility that the defendant will ever regain competence?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18767.

Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, in support of the petition.

Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Custodio

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 6, 2011
17 A.2d 70 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Custodio

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PEDRO CUSTODIO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 6, 2011

Citations

17 A.2d 70 (Conn. 2011)
17 A.2d 70

Citing Cases

State v. Custodio

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the…