From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Correa

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 10, 2019
330 Conn. 959 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

01-10-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Ricardo CORREA

Laila M. G. Haswell, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 308, 197 A.3d 393 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that a police canine sniff that took place outside of the defendant's motel room was not a search that violated the defendant's rights under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the visual sweep of the defendant's motel room was justified by exigent circumstances?"


Summaries of

State v. Correa

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 10, 2019
330 Conn. 959 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Correa

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Ricardo CORREA

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 10, 2019

Citations

330 Conn. 959 (Conn. 2019)
199 A.3d 19

Citing Cases

State v. Correa

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court [correctly] conclude that the visual sweep of the defendant's motel room…

State v. Armadore

3d 1, which did not reverse any established precedent but, rather, followed existing case law from United…