From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Calzada-Padron

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 10, 1998
708 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

noting section 775.087 contains no provision permitting trial court to exercise discretion in imposing three-year minimum mandatory prison sentence once defendant convicted of certain enumerated felonies

Summary of this case from State v. Couch

Opinion

No. 95-01297.

December 27, 1996. Rehearing Denied February 10, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Claudia R. Isom, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen D. Ake, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Manuel A. Machin of Manuel A. Machin, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.


The state appeals the trial court's judgment and sentence which was imposed upon the appellee, Eduardo Calzada-Padron. We affirm the conviction but reverse the sentence.

On August 26, 1994, the state charged the appellee with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, a firearm, and causing great bodily harm in violation of section 784.045, Florida Statutes (1993). The jury found the appellee guilty as charged, and the trial court subsequently adjudicated the appellee guilty and sentenced him to a downward departure of 364 days in the county jail. The state filed a timely notice of appeal.

The state contends that the trial court erred in failing to impose upon the appellee a three year minimum mandatory prison sentence as required pursuant to section 775.087 (2), Florida Statutes (1993). We agree.

Section 775.087 (2) contains no provision permitting the trial court to exercise its discretion in imposing a three year minimum mandatory prison sentence once a defendant has been convicted of certain enumerated felonies. State v. Davis, 639 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), approved, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1995). Since the appellee in the instant case was convicted of one of the enumerated felonies in the statute and had in his possession a firearm, the trial court was required to sentence him to three years in state prison as the minimum sentence. State v. Leatherwood, 561 So.2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); State v. Sesler, 386 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction but reverse the sentence and remand with directions to impose the three year mandatory term required under section 775.087 (2).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Calzada-Padron

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 10, 1998
708 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

noting section 775.087 contains no provision permitting trial court to exercise discretion in imposing three-year minimum mandatory prison sentence once defendant convicted of certain enumerated felonies

Summary of this case from State v. Couch
Case details for

State v. Calzada-Padron

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Eduardo CALZADA-PADRON, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 10, 1998

Citations

708 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Couch

The State correctly asserts that the trial court erred by imposing this sentence contrary to section 775.087,…